You are viewing the older version of this Weblog. I have left this version available for those of you who do not have Javascript enabled in your web browser.

If you have Javascript enabled and would like to view the lastest version of this Weblog, please go here.

June 13, 2005

Informatio: , ,

What's your theological worldview?

Supposedly, this is mine:

You scored as Emergent/Postmodern. You are Emergent/Postmodern in your theology. You feel alienated from older forms of church, you don’t think they connect to modern culture very well. No one knows the whole truth about God, and we have much to learn from each other, and so learning takes place in dialogue. Evangelism should take place in relationships rather than through crusades and altar-calls. People are interested in spirituality and want to ask questions, so the church should help them to do this.

Emergent/Postmodern

79%

Roman Catholic

50%

Classical Liberal

46%

Fundamentalist

46%

Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan

46%

Neo orthodox

46%

Charismatic/Pentecostal

39%

Modern Liberal

39%

Reformed Evangelical

29%

What's your theological worldview?
created with QuizFarm.com
I bet you couldn’t have guessed that about me, right?

(Link via .)

Update: After looking at a bunch of other survey results from others in my Blogroll, I’ve come to find that I probably have a higher “fundamental” standing than anyone else. Strange. Kind of makes me chuckle.

Posted at 11:02 am

Trackback:
Please enable javascript to generate a trackback url

Comments (6):
Emergent/Postmodern: 75%
Modern Liberal: 68%
Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan: 64%
Classical Liberal: 61%
Neo orthodox: 54%
Roman Catholic: 50%
Charismatic/Pentecostal: 25%
Reformed Evangelical: 14%
Fundamentalist: 0%

A hard quiz for me, since I often agreed with half of a statement and disagreed with the other half (which makes this a textbook example of bad quiz design). But it was fun.

wheat () (URL) - June 13, 2005 at 1:46 pm

I was wondering why the quiz seemed a bit “difficult” to me… But, then again, maybe I do lean that far fundamental. ;-)

timsamoff () (URL) - June 13, 2005 at 2:14 pm

I kinda doubt it! But a few cases in point:

There is little or no human element in the Bible, it is a divine book

I get the point of this one, but isn’t it possible that it’s a divine book that also has a strong human element?

Dialogue is preferable to direct confrontation

Often, dialog is a form of direct confrontation. Is the crux here meant to be action vs words? If so, the same problem exists: speaking/writing is a mode of action.

Inner experience is key to understanding God and is a good assurance that he exists

You could certainly support the idea that — given the existence of God — that inner experience is a key to understanding. But claiming inner experience as proof of existence is an entirely seperate question.

wheat () (URL) - June 13, 2005 at 3:13 pm

Hehe… True on all accounts!

(Maybe we should come up with a better quiz, eh?)

timsamoff () (URL) - June 13, 2005 at 3:20 pm

I cracked up to think that you are more of a fundamentalist than me. Ha!

mike king () (URL) - June 14, 2005 at 11:08 am

Most people do think of me as a bible-thumping, stick-to-the-rules type of guy, don’t they? ;-)

timsamoff () (URL) - June 14, 2005 at 11:11 am

  
Remember personal info?

Emoticons / Textile

I have implemented this measure for any Entry over 30 days old in order to alleviate automated spam.
 

  (Register your username / Log in)

Notify:
Hide email:

Small print: All html tags except <b> and <i> will be removed from your comment. You can make links by just typing the url or mail-address.