You are viewing the older version of this Weblog. I have left this version available for those of you who do not have Javascript enabled in your web browser.

If you have Javascript enabled and would like to view the lastest version of this Weblog, please go here.

August 21, 2006

[Book Review] A Heretic's Guide to Eternity: Chapter 3...

Chapter 3 of the book ”,” by , is called, “Grace and the God Factor.” It is most likely the key chapter of the book, dealing with a subject (God’s grace) that is brought up throughout Burke’s entire treatise.

Burke begins the chapter with a very sweet tale of his son telling him how much he loves him. Burke is struck with the question that if his own son can love him so profoundly, how much does God actually love us? Or, maybe more importantly, ”...what does it take to receive God’s love?”

These may seem like simple questions on the surface, but in reality most of us know that, in Western Christianity, the idea is that we do have to earn God’s grace… But, isn’t “earned grace” a paradox?

'A Heretic's Guide to Eternity,' by Specer Burke and Barry Taylor“Could it be that God’s love and grace are actually as subversive as my son’s declaration of love to me that day? Could it be that love finds us no matter where we are and we don’t have to do anything to get it? Could it be that—beyond religion, reason, and conventional wisdom—grace is something to be opted out of rather than opted in to? Is it not something you get but something you already have?”

In the previous quote Spencer Burke brings up, what I think is his thesis for “A Heretic’s Guide to Eternity”: Is God’s grace something that must be opted out of rather than opted in to?

It’s because of these questions—and the quest for something that more adequately defines the true essence of God’s grace—that people are turning away from organized reliogion, towards a new spirituality.

“For years, we have assumed that organized reliogion is the only way humanity can have a relationship with the divine other—whoever that may be. But today, many people are beginning to realize that faith can exist outside the realm of organized religion. The only problem is that religious people don’t understand this option—nor do they want to. They feel threatened by the shift to spirituality, and they’re quick to point out its dangers rather than see its potential. Still, in spite of their best efforts, interest in spirituality is flourishing.”

As the chapter progresses, Spencer moves from defining grace and what this new spirituality is and focuses more on what traditional Christianity primarily sees as the main reason for grace: sin.

“Religion declares that we are separated from God, that we are ‘outsiders.’ Grace tells us the opposite; we are already in unless we want to be out.”

Burke ends Chapter 3 by explaining the paradox of how Chrsitianity’s “grace” is contradictory to God’s grace.

“I grew up in an environment where grace was described as ‘unmerited favor.’ The only problem what that getting this ‘unmerited favor’ still required doing something—namely, ‘asking Jesus in your heart’ or praying a prayer.

“I’m reminded of those people in the mall who are always offering me a ‘free’ gift—and telling me I just have to fill out a survey or apply for a credit card to get it. Let’s be clear. If I have to do something to get it, it’s not free…

“If grace really is unmerited favor and I really can do nothing to get it, then that should be the end of the story. But in my experience, it never is. Religious people love fine print. They just can’t seem to get away from it no matter how hard they try. It’s always God loves you—but…”

This is actually a concept I’ve been dealing with since I was a young child. If God’s grace is free, then why do we have to do so much to get it? If it’s not free, I wish someone could tell me why?

« previous entry in series
next entry in series »

Posted at 09:55 am

Trackback:
Please enable javascript to generate a trackback url

Comments (5):
I think the reason why it is free is that we all deserve death. That if Jesus didn’t die and rose again we would all be Spiritually dead. Therefore, when we accept Christ it is free in that Jesus did something we didn’t deserve. Any gift given is free the opening of the gift is always dependent on us. I don’t think “opening a gift: that I received for free doesn’t make the gift any less free. :)

dh () - August 22, 2007 at 07:21 am

I think the problem I have is the suggestion that this is religion when God’s Word explains clearly the nature of these things.

dh () - August 22, 2007 at 07:22 am

I don’t think your analogy quite works, Doug. Usually the typical Christian response to God’s grace is: “You can have it IF…” or, “You don’t get it UNLESS you…” Those phrases aren’t indicitive of “free” at all. Free means: “Yes, the gift is yours…”

Now, I’m not arguing whether Chrsitianity has it right or not. Maybe grace is something that we need to do something for. But, to say it’s “free” or “unmerited” might then be a misnomer. In my Christian experience, grace is anything but unmerited when it comes to “our” use of the word.

timsamoff () (URL) - August 22, 2007 at 07:37 am

Wouldn’t it be free if we deserve death without Christs death and resurrection? Also I think this pretty much explains it for meat least “I don’t think “opening a gift: that I received for free doesn’t make the gift any less free. :)” I guess when you open a gift at Christmas that you think it isn’t free because you had to open the gift to enjoy it. :) It seems to work because there have been times I received a gift but failed to open them and these gifts were free but I never experienced the joy of the free gift because I never opened it. (on this ocassion it was a scarf from my aunt when I was 10 years old :) ) I think the “you can have it if..” is a matter of semantics and the understood analogy above is unmentioned “from my experience” by the “made available to all”.

dh () - August 22, 2007 at 08:22 am

If someone gave me a free “Hersheys” kiss but I never unwrapped the kiss and eat it then how can I ever say that I “tasted it”? :) “Taste and see that the Lordis good.” (I know out of context more for humor sake. :) ) This also doesn’t take away the fact that I didn’t have to pay for the “Hershey’s” kiss making the kiss free.

dh () - August 22, 2007 at 10:27 am

  
Remember personal info?

Emoticons / Textile

I have implemented this measure for any Entry over 30 days old in order to alleviate automated spam.
 

  (Register your username / Log in)

Notify:
Hide email:

Small print: All html tags except <b> and <i> will be removed from your comment. You can make links by just typing the url or mail-address.